How the “Islamic Antichrist” reflects our era’s anxieties

(RNS) Every age needs an Antichrist.

Protestant Reformers picked the papacy as their embodiment of evil. American colonists chose King George III and some Cold War Christians suspected the Soviet Union was satanically led.

Now, amid threats of Islamic terrorism, a nuclear-armed Iran and tumult across the Middle East, a growing group of American evangelicals say the Antichrist will be Muslim.

Antichrist with the devil, from the Deeds of the Antichrist circa 1501.

Antichrist with the devil, from the Deeds of the Antichrist circa 1501.

“I understand that I’m going to be viewed as a fringe, apocalyptic Christian,” said Joel Richardson, author of several books predicting an Islamic Antichrist. “But I fully own the idea that the Antichrist will be a Muslim and will come out of the Muslim world.”

These days, even the fringe has a faithful following. On websites, television programs, conferences and books, conservative Christians like Richardson warn that a Muslim Antichrist will raise an army to attack Israel, in fulfillment of the biblical prophets and the Book of Revelation.

From there, they say, it’s a short road to Armageddon.

“Today, we’re seeing the beginning signs of that exact prophecy coming to pass,” warns Richardson.

Scholars say the arrival of Islamic Antichrist prophecies was, well, predictable.

“I think the shift to Islam was just waiting to happen,” said Glenn Shuck, an assistant professor of religion at Williams College who has studied evangelicals’ views on the apocalypse.

A certain kind of Christian, sometimes dubbed “armchair apocalyptists” or “newspaper exegetes,” seems especially inclined to cast their foes as agents of the Archenemy. The Antichrist they identify, scholars say, often reflects the era’s deepest anxieties.

For many modern Christian apocalyptists, fears of big government are embodied by an Antichrist imagined to unite nation-states in a totalitarian One World Order.

Since 9/11, though, Islamist terrorism has crept from the front pages into apocalyptic thrillers like the “Left Behind” series and nonfiction books such as Richardson’s “Mideast Beast” and “Islamic Antichrist.”

Richardson, a 40-year-old decorative painter from Missouri who jokingly refers to his writings as “an expensive hobby,” presents his prophecies as straightforward interpretations of the Bible, including the Book of Revelation.

?I understand that I?m going to be viewed as a fringe, apocalyptic Christian,? said Joel Richardson, author of several books predicting an Islamic Antichrist.

?I understand that I?m going to be viewed as a fringe, apocalyptic Christian,? said Joel Richardson, author of several books predicting an Islamic Antichrist.

Revelation, which never actually uses the word “Antichrist,” is one of the first Christian texts to cast rivals as Satan’s spawn. Many scholars say phrases like “the mark of the beast” and “666” are coded references to the Emperor Nero, who persecuted Christians.

For many early Christians, however, the Antichrist was not a particular person. It was spiritual figure who lurked in the hearts of all believers, luring them toward sin and heresy, said Shuck.

By the 12th century, the Antichrist – often seen as a human inhabited by Satan – had become a tool for identifying an enemy, fomenting fear and assembling an army.

“The Antichrist moves a long way from Augustine’s view of something that we all face inside us,” Shuck said, “to being very much an external battle with concrete figures.”

Popes used the Antichrist to rally Crusaders. Reformers used the Antichrist to battle popes. Northerners saw the Antichrist in the slave-holding South, and Southerners saw the same specter in the abolitionists.

In the modern era, Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, U.S. presidents, former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev, England’s Prince Charles, and even megachurch pastor Rick Warren have all made the Antichrist list.

Apocalyptic Christianity always needs an enemy, scholars say, and the Antichrist is nothing if not adaptable.

“The Antichrist idea is very responsive to changes in current events,” said Robert Fuller, a professor of religious studies at Bradley University in Peoria, Ill. “It’s a symbol for what is most unsettling or troubling.”

Antichrist prophecies raise fears by warning of an imminent battle between good and evil, Fuller said, and settle those fears by assuring Christians that the “good guys” will win in the end.

If bad theology, the Antichrist often makes for good reading, as attested by the more than 60 million copies of “Left Behind” books sold.

Prophecy may not be the best career option, however. Jerry Falwell’s Liberty University closed its Tim LaHaye School of Prophecy just one year after it opened in 2002.

“It never did attract hardly any students, so we shut it down,” said Ronald Godwin, Liberty’s provost. “The students were looking for a major that would land them a career.”

Prophecy might not be the safest profession, either.

A press release for one of Richardson’s books begins by noting a threat on the author’s life, and acknowledges that fears of Islamic terrorism have fueled interest in the idea of a Muslim Antichrist.

Not all apocalyptic Christians agree with Richardson, however.

Richardson’s own press release asserts that Hal Lindsay, perhaps the most famous modern-day doomsayer, is one his staunchest critics.

Tim LaHaye, co-author of the bestselling series “Left Behind” and one of conservative Christianity’s most respected apocalyptists, doesn’t buy Richardson’s theories, either.

“His book is interesting and informative,” LaHaye said in a recent interview, “but his argument on the Antichrist is ridiculous.” LaHaye and his ilk say the Antichrist must come from Roman stock, and point to modern-day Romania as his likely birthplace.

Muslim leaders and progressive groups are even more critical of Richardson.

Eric Boehlert, a senior fellow at the group Media Matters, said Richardson popped onto his radar after a 2011 appearance on Glenn Beck’s now-defunct Fox News show.

“If Richardson was saying these things about Christianity or Judaism he wouldn’t be able to get a pamphlet published,” Boehlert said, “but unfortunately, there’s a market in right-wing America that’s decided Islam is pure evil.”

Ibrahim Hooper, a spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said calling Islam or any other religion evil often leads to violence. Earlier this month, for example, a Muslim family in Oklahoma reported that their home had been attacked by a sniper after an individual asked about their religion, according to CAIR.

“There’s a question we should ask of all hatemongers who attack Islam,” Hooper said. “What is your end game here?”

Print Friendly

3 Responses to “How the “Islamic Antichrist” reflects our era’s anxieties”

  1. Luke

    How can he be sure he’s not it? Amen to Michele Joseph! Absolutely!

  2. Michele Joseph

    Above, vibtates should read vibrates.

  3. Michele Joseph

    I have read that some scholars define the term “Messiah” -not as an individual,but, rather, an era “the Messianic era” or as a spirit or state of mind “Christ-conciousness”.Likewise, the Anti-Christ can be viewed the same.
    The concept of the “Anti-Christ” could be characterized as that which runs counter to
    the Christ -an era during which the “Spirit of the Age”- the zeitgeist vibtates in opposition to “Christ-conciousness” -that which is “Anti-Christ”. Therefore, if Christ represents love, peace, good-will, loving-kindness,compassion, tolerance & forgiveness, then any individual or assemblage of individuals who endevour to promote division, conflict,intolerance, meaness and hatred are operating in the spirit of the Ant-Christ. So, my friend, if you are attempting to spread enmity, distrust, discord, and hatred,casting judgements a promoting attitudes that will result in conflict and you are looking for the Anti-Christ, well, then, the Antichrist is as close as your nearest mirror.

Comments are closed.