Muslims criticize judge’s dismissal of NYPD spying lawsuit

(RNS) Muslim Americans and civil rights groups are criticizing a federal judge’s dismissal of a lawsuit alleging the New York City Police Department illegally spied on Muslim Americans in New Jersey. “By upholding the NYPD’s blunderbuss Muslim surveillance practices, the court’s decision gives legal sanction to the targeted discrimination of Muslims anywhere and everywhere in this country, without limitation, for no other reason than their religion,” said Baher Azmy, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights, one of the organizations that filed the lawsuit.
Syed Farhaj Hassan, 35, who is now the first-named plaintiff in a lawsuit filed last week by Muslims Advocates group (on behalf of NJ Muslims) vs. the NYPD is photographed in his home in Helmetta, NJ on June 15, 2012.

Syed Farhaj Hassan, 35, the first-named plaintiff in a lawsuit filed by Muslims Advocates (on behalf of New Jersey Muslims) versus the NYPD is photographed in his home in Helmetta, N.J., on June 15, 2012. RNS photo by John Munson/The Star-Ledger

This image is available for Web and print publication. For questions, contact Sally Morrow.

The suit, Hassan v. City of New York, was filed in 2012 by Muslim Advocates. The Center for Constitutional Rights joined in the suit later that year. The suit alleged that Muslims were spied on solely based on their religion, and that, as a result, they cannot visit mosques, Muslim-owned businesses and other related activities without living in fear of being spied on. The plaintiffs said internal NYPD documents included a list of 28 “ancestries of interest” and other policies showing that officers based their spying on the ethnic and religious background of their targets. U.S. District Judge William Martini in Newark disagreed in his ruling. “The more likely explanation for the surveillance was to locate budding terrorist conspiracies,” he wrote. “The police could not have monitored New Jersey for Muslim terrorist activities without monitoring the Muslim community itself.” Glenn Katon of Muslim Advocates said that reasoning was flawed. “The way you uncover terrorist plots is that you uncover leads,” he said. “You don’t just wander into mosques and businesses and spy on people. You follow leads based on information that criminal activity is being planned or is going on.” Katon added that the NYPD surveillance program had not uncovered a single lead since its inception several years ago. He said he believed Martini’s decision would be overturned on appeal. The NYPD did not respond to a request for comment. YS/AMB END SACIRBEY The post Muslims criticize judge’s dismissal of NYPD spying lawsuit appeared first on Religion News Service.

One Response to “Muslims criticize judge’s dismissal of NYPD spying lawsuit”

  1. Christy Besozzi

    So…maybe the initial scrutiny of the Muslim community was somehow justifiable if they had some leads that pointed in that direction. Let’s just assume that for this discussion.

    But, if they have done this scrutiny for several years with no findings indicating terrorists in the Muslim community’s midst, then, obviously, there is now no further need for such intense scrutiny unless a specific threat needs to be investigated and the trail leads to more individuals (only) in the Muslim community.

    This is just another “teachable moment” that indicates that prejudice (pre-judging) is counter-productive, does not work, and wastes public funds.

    I only wish that those members of my faith, the Baha’i Faith, who are located in the Islamic Republic of Iran were also treated without prejudice by that government.

    Prejudice of any kind is a very destructive force that needs to be recognized and resisted in all its forms and locations.

Comments are closed.