Brian McLaren came to town recently and spoke about one of my favorite topics: “A New Way of Being Church.”
His lecture was a part of the Ohio Ministries Convocation 2013, held Jan. 29 at Sylvania United Methodist Church.
McLaren has been speaking about "new ways" for much of his career. One of his most popular books, "A New Kind of Christian" (2001), has been widely read by young evangelicals who are questioning their orthodox tradition and creating new postmodern communities.
Some progressives also like McLaren because he champions what we have been saying all along about justice and mercy, while pushing us to claim Jesus more boldly and to find common ground with our evangelical brothers and sisters.
In his Sylvania lecture, McLaren made one simple statement about the church over and over: "The future is going to be different than the past."
I found myself writing down those words with a chuckle. Don’t we all realize this? One would have to be blind, deaf and mute not to know that the future is going to be different than the past, right?
But McLaren drove the point home in not so many words: Churches that do not change will die. They will not attract young people. Their members will be dead and buried. It is simple logic.
His message was not completely “doom and gloom,” however. McLaren offered hope. He directed us to, of all places, a really smart guy named Otto Scharmer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Scharmer studies frameworks for leadership and change. Scharmer writes: “We live in an era of intense conflict and massive institutional failures, a time of painful endings and of hopeful beginnings. It is a time that feels as if something profound is shifting and dying while something else, as the [late] playwright and Czech president, Václav Havel, put it, 'wants to be born.’"
McLaren explained that Scharmer’s work calls for rethinking an entire system from scratch.
In a church system, for example, we have to let go of everything we have known in the past. We have to let ourselves simply “be” before we can let the new church come into being. The future will be different from the past. We cannot see the future until we die to the past.
He used a wonderful example of how, in 2001, the U.S. Postal Service did not see e-mail as a threat. The Postal Service leaders were so wrong. By 2012, the U.S. Postal Service was in serious financial trouble and began to say that it might need to expand into other businesses because e-mail had had such an effect on communications.
“In the church, we have to ask ourselves: Are we in the envelope, paper, stamp, mailbox, and post office business?," McLaren said.
He then wrapped up his lecture by hinting as some of the ways church leaders might begin to learn how to prepare for our new future.
“Change happens when movement leaders and institutional leaders collaborate,” he said. That is, the leaders of dying institutions need to learn from those who are leading great social change movements right now. For example, the church that neglects the power of social media will be dead in 20 years. Personally, I would venture to say it is probably already on life support but does not know it.
The future is going to be different than the past. Something profound is shifting and dying while something else wants to be born. Many of our beloved and faithful churches and faith communities are closing. They have served us well. The future for followers of Jesus and other people of faith looks different.
As a church planter, I am grateful for the freedom to create something that is completely new and different -- or, as McLaren called it, “A New Way of Being Church.”
Otto Scharmer invites us rethink our whole system so that something new can come into being. I think I remember the Apostle Paul once saying that we become a new creation when we follow the way of Jesus. In order to be relevant in this 21st century, it appears that our churches, like ourselves, will need to be changed completely, from the inside out.





David Yonke | Feb 26, 2013 | 4:07pm
Brian McLaren is a visionary and I have learned a lot from his books and lectures. Thanks for writing about this lecture—I hope Toledo-area church leaders take note of what McLaren had to say.
Cheri Holdridge | Feb 26, 2013 | 5:26pm
I was happy to hear Mclaren and to write about his lecture. Thanks for your comment, David. I believe many church leaders are listening to what Mclaren and others are saying. We know that what we are doing is no longer working. The question is this: do we have the courage to listen to God? Will we die to what we have always done and let something new be born, with God’s help? I, for one, want to be “a new kind of Christian” which ironically, takes us back to 1st century Christianity.
Bill Herzog | Feb 26, 2013 | 10:24pm
I guess my question is…do the new christian…or the new church discard scripture? Is that old fashioned? I agree things are changing…but I am guessing practice needs to change…not the way scripture is viewed…or translated. I am thinking we are trying so hard to be culturally current…maybe it is time to be counter culture…gabe Lyons has a good book out on this…
Cheri Holdridge | Feb 26, 2013 | 10:35pm
Interesting comment Bill. In my circles some of the most amazing signs I see of new life are in smaller new communities of faith that are deeply grounded in scripture. Often these communities live out their values in generosity, service, and working for justice. We do it because we have studied the words of Jesus and we are crazy enough to take him seriously.
Bill herzog | Mar 2, 2013 | 11:13am
I get “the words of Jesus"all right…would love to see more of the church do that. But I find it interesting we have to bend to culture rather than set culture. And we seem to forget Paul, Peter, Jesus Himself and the others spoke into cultures much like the one we live in now…and did not change the story…we become “red letter” because it seems Jesus does not speak about things the Moses or even Paul does.
In one conversation with a young man over a subject he asked me to read Romans 2 to defend his position or to remind me not to judge and that God’s kindness leads to repentance, not that repenting was an option. But I had to ask him if he read Romans 1…seems that was skipped over. Do we now have a Readers Digest version of scripture? Or are we back to the days prior to the reformation where only the experts understand what scripture really says? Interesting times….
PastorLuke | Mar 11, 2013 | 1:44pm
I loved what McLaren had to say at this event as well as what he says in his books. Just a great mind and wonderful pastor.
Mike Kerrigan | May 6, 2013 | 5:03pm
Hello Pastors Luke, Bob, and Cheri. I believe that McClaren is correct. Churches that are run as a business if they do not please their consumers, will certainly die. But the question I pose is what is the purpose of the Church. Is it to please the people or glorify God as the “spotless bride”. It certainly seems His Bride has a little spiffing up to do but I do not believe our Lord and Savior will let His bride die. I’m sure things have looked pretty bleak for Her over the years and yet here we are. The Church does need to change, it needs to be “fitly joined together in the bonds of Love”. What does that mean? Head, shoulders, knees, and toes, eyes, ears, mouth, and nose….all coming together, working together in their differences under His Lordship proclaiming and demonstrating that the Kingdom is at hand! I will not be too sad for churches that do not proclaim Jesus as Lord and do not confess that He is the Son of God who came in the flesh to satisfiy God’s righteous judgement on sin for the purpose of reconciling man to Himself out of Love….I will not be too sad if those churches do fade away. And even though in the flesh the situation looks bleak for the Church that does believe the above, He is faithful to His Bride and She will live and survive by Grace through Faith in Love. Mike
zappa912 | May 18, 2013 | 10:21am
I am the first to admit that it is difficult for me to delve into deep theological discussions. I agree that religious organizations need to adapt to some extent to the times. Saying that however, I still hold to my simplistic beliefs that if we treat others the way we want to be treated, and we continually search for ways to love, respect and help one another, we are fulfilling the spiritual mission taught by most organized religions. Holding onto existing members and attracting new members revolve around these basic teachings. How they are communicated effectively continues to be the challenge as it has been for thousands of years. Leading a good life often requires an individual to make difficult decisions. I think many people learn that having a strong spiritual or moral foundation can help in that decision-making process. Thus a relevant religious organization can be a strong source of support, especially in difficult times.
Add Your Comment