Leila Sansour, the founder of Open Bethlehem, a non-governmental foundation established to promote and protect the life and heritage of the city, was asked: “What gives you the most hope in this work?”
Leila replied:
The situation on the ground in Palestine and Israel is just so bad. Rather than feeling weak, angry and disempowered, I believe strongly that we can do it. When you find the will in yourself and you see it in your partners, you feel that there must be a way. Some people are very pessimistic and say, 'Nothing will succeed.' But I don’t want to believe it for a second.
Just this past week, these words of Leila became a challenge for me when a fragile truce was called between Hamas and the Israeli military.
Of course I felt elation. But very soon I also remembered the many historical failed truces and processes between these two countries.
Efforts in recent decades include the comprehensive peace process of 1991; the failed Oslo Peace Process of 1994; the Taba, Egypt, meeting of 1995; the failed peace talks again in Taba in 2001; the 2002 U.N. Resolution 1397 vetoed by the U.S. to set up two states side by side; the failed efforts of Presidents Clinton, George Bush and Obama to make any just settlements in favor of both the Israelis and Palestinians.
George Cappacio, storyteller, artist, and Middle East specialist, writes so poignantly of one major barrier in any peace settlement in the Middle East: continued assurances given to Israelis in their need for security and our country’s steady betrayals toward the Palestinian people in their human rights needs.
In Cappacio's article about the recent Israeli incursion into Gaza he states:
In 2008, during a visit to Israel, Obama expressed his profound sympathy for Israeli citizens who live under the constant threat of terrorist attacks in towns like Siderot. Like any loving parent, he would not countenance anyone deliberately endangering the lives of his own children: 'If somebody shot rockets at my house where my two daughters were sleeping at night, I’d do everything in my power to stop them. ….'
From Nov. 12-21, Operation Pillar of Defense gave Obama the opportunity again to speak to the human rights of all people involved. Instead, most recently in Thailand, he again spoke exclusively about Israel’s “rights:”
“There’s no country on earth that would tolerate missiles raining down on its citizens from outside its border. … We are fully supportive of Israel’s right to defend itself.”
Where is the mention of the Palestinians’ rights for self defense?
Sansour says that no matter what the odds in bringing justice and peace to the Palestinian territories, “we can do it” in partnerships with each other.
It is difficult for any of us to imagine that after so many failed peace efforts in the Middle East, there may still be a way — i.e. to bring a collective partner strength forward that results in a new alignment of power in this tense area of the world.
The old saying, "You can fool some of the people some of the time but not all the people all the time” is surely true in this issue. Our media coverup and its twisting of the truth, and, second, our government’s blind support of Israel, despite what citizens are urging Congress to do, have so far succeeded in keeping justice underground and in keeping collective partnerships from bonding together for a stronger voice.
But all of us activists are working for the day when journalism will again be practiced with true integrity and when more and more citizens will demand justice of our government toward the Palestinians.
A great spiritual master insisted that when a person feels that the options have run out in the pursuit of justice and truth, the thing to do is talk with your feet. The feet are more important in discipleship than the mouth. Keep on. Keep going with your feet.
Leila Sansour, we will trust you. Our feet, even now, are pushing ahead with you.









Charity Kallmeyer | Mar 15, 2013 | 12:31pm
These deliberations tend to include three options supplied by older All of us army officials: a higher quantity, a low quantity, and one in the actual middle that the All of us military brass believes is optimum 鈥?or at least their finest wager given the politics environment at that time.Afghan G <a >christian louboutin sale</a> resident Cash taken will meet with President Obama Fri within the wake of a brand new twist: The Obama administration leaked this news that it’s thinking about the 鈥渮ero option鈥?too. RECOMMENDED: War along with Iran? 5 ways occasions overseas might form Obama’s 2nd phrase. Protection Assistant Leon Panetta stressed Thursday after an hour-long one-on-one meeting with Mister. Karzai at the Government that the Usa is actually 鈥渇ully committed to finishing the actual job鈥?in Afghanistan.Older defense officials sidestepped the actual question, however, associated with regardless of whether zero troops is really a realistic choice in post-2014 Afghanistan.鈥淲e鈥檝e sa <a >cheap christian louboutin</a> id from the start which absolutely no option is entirely off the table,鈥?said Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman from the Combined Chiefs of Employees, during a Pentagon briefing Thursday. Obtain our Totally free The year 2013 Global Security Forecast now Older US officials insist, too, they’re seriously interested in the potential of pulling almost all All of us soldiers out of Afghanistan following All of us combat operations end, that is planned to occur at the conclusion of 2014.鈥淭here are, of course, a number of ways of acc <a >christian louboutin sale</a> omplishing those goals, most of which may involve US troops, most of which might not,鈥?Ben Rhodes, deputy national security consultant with regard to proper communication, informed reporters inside a conference call Tuesday.Generation. John Allen, leader people causes within Afghanistan, offers submitted military options that include three ideas with regard to troop levels at 6,Thousand, 10,Thousand, as well as 20,000.Through placing a 鈥渮ero option鈥?on the table in advance of Karzai鈥檚 visit, however, the Obama administration is injecting less figure in the actual military鈥檚 鈥淕oldi <a >christian louboutin on sale</a> locks鈥?approach. This particular, in turn, changes the actual terms of the discussion, <a >cheap christian louboutin</a> because any kind of figure greater than zero appears like a compromise.鈥淚 suspect there鈥檚 most likely some gamesmanship included,鈥?states Jeffrey Dressler, the older research expert at the Start for that Research associated with Battle, the Wa think container.
Add Your Comment